Quoi de neuf ?

Bienvenue sur Psychonaut.fr !

Le forum des amateurs de drogues et des explorateurs de l'esprit

the forum

Statut
N'est pas ouverte pour d'autres réponses.
It was noticed that you arent awake and living in a dream world but your "life" is your responsibility be a big boy and wake yourself up . Try a bit of objectivity and not so much self pity .
 
CaduceusMercurius a dit:
Tiax a dit:
Maybe you should create a section for these subjects, in order to prevent topics from people who believe in that and those from people who don't to overlap.
That was suggested a while ago. But there was opposition. :wink:
To clarify this, you can read the discussion about it, starting with the second post on this page).

I appreciate what gammagoblin wrote in a thread he started named "loony stuff".
gammagoblin a dit:
A thought occured to me about the "loonie stuff"... Isn't the psychedelic experience also just a ride through insanity (consequently loonie stuff)? Not trying to degrade the psychedelic experience because I think you can learn a lot from temporal insanity. But couldn't it also be thrown on the same heap all the other "loonie stuff"? Or do you really see the experience as something serious? Because I think one can also learn from the other loonie stuff, and in the end that's the only thing that matters, not whether it has to be taken seriously.
 
CaduceusMercurius a dit:
1) Do you think I've failed as a site administrator for this Psychonaut community in the way I handled the presence of new member Ahuaeynjxs?

2) Is my personal interest in numerology, harmonics, sacred geometry and astrology annoying to you?

3) What do you think about the way Ahuaeynjxs interacts with others?

4) What do you think about the way GOD interacts with others?

5) What do you think about the way I interact with Ahuaeynjxs, GOD and all of you?

6) Does it bug you that some members want to discuss psychedelics in the context of esoteric issues, like the Mayan calendar, 2012, chakras, synchronicity, astrology etc.?

7) Or conversely: does it bug you that such discussions are invariable followed by ridicule?

1)Nop I don't, but perhaps you could have calmed things down a little when a topic got a little "warm". Just advise, no (verwijten)

2)&6)&7) I'm aware this has been suggested several times, but I support the idea that it might be helped by a new part on forum that would be called 'parascience' or so

3) I admit I irritated myself when Ahuaeynjxs made (to my opinion) not evidence-based claims. I felt sometimes insulted. But with a little recoil, I guess I might have provoked it sometimes.

4)I'm only recently active on the forum, but as far as I've been reading, I don't think I would have suspected GOD to be a moderator if it wasn't written under his name. I would have expected more posed/eased/calmer opinions from a moderator. The least you can say is that GOD mostly does defend his opinions. But I will express no judgement on this.

5) the fact that you've made this topic proves that you do care, doesn't it?


In hope that we all might contribute and participate to make this forum the peaceful, serene and friendly forum it has always been, in acceptance of others' opinions/views,

AcHiLLeSS
 
"I would have expected more posed/eased/calmer opinions from a moderator."

Just a word: I never saw any moderator act as something else than a psychonaut. There are even some users that are actually moderators but don't show it under their names/at all.
 
Can we please separate those two things . I am a member and write as a member . I have never had to do any moderation in the threads where i am a moderator . If i had to i would then be representing the site and i would do my best to do it fairly and neutraly in the interests of the site .

I dont feel ilke i`ve got to fullfill your thoughts about what a moderator can say or do . Just because i`m a moderator doesnt mean i cant have personal thoughts and feelings and not express them . Here we are all equal and free to be ourselves . There is no moderator heyerarchy .

Please feel free to be yourself and have fun on the forum .
 
but those "thoughts" are not mine, none are anyone's ; it's about time we realise this ; we all channe

As this seemed vaguely offtopic I'm gonna respond.

Why & How

Answer these two questions in normal peoples speak please?

I can't shake off the illusion of escapism with these kinds of posts.

Edit: And trust me, you don't want me to start using that excuse (actually I don't want me to do that either since it'd probably be waay too easy to vent negative energy in an insulting way).
 
If you cannot discriminate between someone trying to vent negative energy in the distance, on the internet ; which is something that most people would consider ridiculous...

well you should flee from this field where love reaps, put back on your clothes and never turn back.

Thats my opinion.

It's basic philosophy, the root of Plato's ponderings ; the intelligible and the unintelligible as a "layer" over our minds which allow us to realise that what we see are merely shadows on the wall of the cave.

Without knowing that we don't know much...

well I'm sure you know that !
 
silv a dit:
Edit: And trust me, you don't want me to start using that excuse (actually I don't want me to do that either since it'd probably be waay too easy to vent negative energy in an insulting way).
Did you actually edit that post after posting it first?
 
"Did you actually edit that post after posting it first?"

Caduceus , are you asking if it was possible to edit a post without the post edited bit appearing at the bottom of the post ? If you are , yes it is possible . Every time i see i made a typographical mistake i edit it out and only rarely does that note apear .
 
Yes, I'm curious.

Edit: test 1
 
I think if you edit the post in the next minute or so it dosen't show, or maybe it's the number of characters you edit ?
 
silv a dit:
but those "thoughts" are not mine, none are anyone's ; it's about time we realise this ; we all channe

As this seemed vaguely offtopic I'm gonna respond.

Why & How

Answer these two questions in normal peoples speak please?

I can't shake off the illusion of escapism with these kinds of posts.

Edit: And trust me, you don't want me to start using that excuse (actually I don't want me to do that either since it'd probably be waay too easy to vent negative energy in an insulting way).

I'm glad you noticed that as well, it's what I was attempting to get into with my long winded post yesterday.

The beauty of the cave parable is that no matter which man was freed and allowed to see the world for the first time, each man would bring back his own story and interpretation of the world that he saw. It provides the man with an epiphany that there is a larger world than what he perceived before. He does not possess the capability to fully understand it let alone describe it. The experience doesn't really bring him any closer to knowing truth. At best, it sets him on the path seeking understanding. It's a curious aspect of the human psyche, that we can so easily accept that our beliefs represent some self-evident, even divine truth (to which we are privy), avoiding having to acknowledge the role that outlook, environment, self, ego, etc play in shaping our beliefs and hence in how we interpret the world around us.
 
^Well said

[e] And the edit thing: it doesn't show most of the times I change a few letters or add something.
 
Yeah I'd think you have to edit more than a few words...

It's a skill to turn around the philosophy of Plato, if Socrates existed his too to make it look like a mere opening, while it isn't.

It's said that if you come out f the darkness into the light you will be blinded for a while, but mercury made my eyes invincible, there is no bias to my perception, but I am still human and I make errors of communication and memory.

I do not remember everything, by careful interaction with others those things pop back to my mind as self-evident, and my body has gone though enough near death experiences to tell the difference between holographic information and simple "entity" chanelling.

Of course you should not beleive that, but it is what it is ; convincing myself of the contrary isn't going to change my purpose.

All holograms are equal regardless of size, is that a paradox to you ? It isn't to me.
 
For the 6th time, I must find real psychonauts. 6 to be exact.

And we must clear the 7 logoi planes of "drugs" by exploration and observation with a prime directive, in a philosophy much like that of Gene Roddenberry. The only difference is that once the solar counsil of elders hear of our reports, they will send swarm of guardians to those locations effectively crumbling down whole imaginary networks ; having unestimable repercussions on our daily life.

I am the only remaining way to glory.

Yes, I'm a meek nerd. Thanks for caring :)
 
Get help.
 
Thats exactly what I just said I'm trying to do.

Not thats it's very important... if we don't act, it's only the world who will take a beating, and who cares about the world, right ?

I don't mind seeing 80% of the population die, but some of you might, because thats exactly the plan put up by the illuminati ; I offer an alternative.

Take it or leave it, it's not extreme in itself.
 
Statut
N'est pas ouverte pour d'autres réponses.
Retour
Haut