G
Guest
Guest
1) Do you think I've failed as a site administrator for this Psychonaut community in the way I handled the presence of new member Ahuaeynjxs?
Can't pronounce myself on this, didn't really followed the whole story. From my point of view, you're doing fine.
2) Is my personal interest in numerology, harmonics, sacred geometry and astrology annoying to you?
No, I don't believe in it at all, but as long as you don't try to impose it on me, I'm ok with it, people believes in what they want to believe, it's the whole "conversion" stuff that drives me mad.
3) What do you think about the way Ahuaeynjxs interacts with others?
I don't know the guy, haven't read a lot from him.
4) What do you think about the way GOD interacts with others?
Ahah, now that's an interesting question
I remember getting mad with him one year ago I think, then things calmed down between us, and he helped me with lots of things.
The thing is, I think we share the same "rational" view on the world, thus I tend to agree with what he says and therefore I am usually not the victim of his ire
I agree that he sometimes is a bit too passionated, but hey, GOD is GOD, he's the kind of person you have to take as a whole, with his defaults but also his qualities.
So GOD, even if I sometime think that you could be a bit more comprehensive when you give your opinions on stuff, I understand that it's just the way you are, and I don't think you're going to change. And that personally doesn't bother me.
What do you think about the way I interact with Ahuaeynjxs, GOD and all of you?
No comments
6) Does it bug you that some members want to discuss psychedelics in the context of esoteric issues, like the Mayan calendar, 2012, chakras, synchronicity, astrology etc.?
No, it doesn't bother me, unless this kind of thing appears in what I judge to be a serious conversation (from my point of view, once again), turning it into a fight between people who believe in it and people who don't.
I think this kind of stuff should be discussed in their own topics and not mentionned in a conversation that initially had nothing to do with it.
7) Or conversely: does it bug you that such discussions are invariable followed by ridicule?
That's what I just pointed out.