aaaaaaAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!! How cute , me against the rest again !!!! Life starts to get that little bit more challenging , with the emphasis on little . A fight on several fronts might cause me to have to use more than two brain cells to tango with you all as was the case up till now.........wich was getting boring .
So Roeligan , that was a nice try ......BUT . Firstly the thread wasnt only about MOAIs and possible Psilocybin potentiation , it was realy about peoples claims that P.Harmala can potentiate Psilocybin mushrooms . I should have made that clearer but i didnt think that i could get that all in in the title . Have we read all of the thread or are we ignoring all the evidence i have brought up up untill now ??? What about the evidence that i have used from ...... qualified ...... experts . Like Icono , D.Mckenna , C.Rätsch , D.Nichols , A.Shulgin and J.Ott ???
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.gnosticmedia.com/communion/v ... .php?t=171
From a letter from Jan Irving of "Psychotic Inquisition" fame to D.Mckenna:-
"I wanted to ask you about the 4-substitution making psilocybin orally active, can you shed more light on this subject?"
and
"forward from icono "The 4-sub position is actually quite important, even if it's not unique. Ever wonder why you can take psilocybin orally and it's active without an MAOI unlike, say DMT, or 5MEO? It's because the NNdimethyl "tail" can swing around and form a complex with the "O" at the 4 position, making it impervious to MAO in the gut. That's from a Dennis McKenna talk by the way. So if you don't chuck the whole idea, you might say something like the 4-subbed position makes it active orally all by itself, allowing mind expansion with simple ingestion, unlike its parent structure, DMT which has to be combined with an MAOI to be effective through the gut."
Did we understand that ? Psilocybin is impervious to MAO . ( Impervious = 1:- not permitting penetration or passage ; impenetrable . 2:- incapable of being injured or impaired . 3:- incapable of being influenced, persuaded, or affected .)
D.Mckenna replied:-
"Regarding Icono's comments above, he has it exactly right. It’s true that apparently Psilocin is orally active is because , in the charged, physiological state you get a weak hydrogen bonding between the indole HO- (which is deproteinated) and the side-chain nitrogen (which is protonated). So you do get that steric hindrance happening that protects it from MAO. This is not from me, by the way, this is straight from the guru of chemistry himself, Dave Nichols!"
Did we understand that ? Steric hindrance protects Psilocin from MAO . ( Himderance = 1:- The act of hindering or obstructing or impeding . 2:- Impeding, stopping, preventing . Protects = To keep from being damaged, attacked, or injured .)
For the T.Mckenna fan club a little straight left and a right hook to the jaw from the same page.........
Jan Irvin said to D.Mckenna in two letters:-
"Someone [icono] has informed us that the statements made by you and Terence about the nature of psilocybin, are incorrect. " and "Terence had (I believe) at one time mentioned that 4-hydroxy is only found in psilocybin mushrooms, and was therefore a sort of "alien" substance."
and
"This is from chemist [icono]," , "He’s helping us make sure this section about DMT clears up the mistakes in Terence’s description," .
D.Mckenna replied:-
"I don’t believe I ever said that psilocybin and/or psilocin are the only 4-substituted indoles in nature"
and
"Terence was not a chemist, and occasionally made statements that were less than accurate when it came to chemistry" .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.Shulgin says in Tihkal on page 295 talking about people trying to potentiate allready psychoactive substances:-
" Recently , however ,there has been a move to explore many other well known drugs as this second component , perhaps illogicaly , in that all these are well established as being oraly active " "it is almost as if the P.Harmala is being called upon to play a roll of modifyer or enhancer ( or even to an extent, contributer ) of activity, rather than one of being a simple revealer of activity . This brings up the vital question : If P.Harmala can directly contribute to the action of another drug by some process other than that of potentiation or synergism , or simply allowing this other drug to become oraly active due to its presence , then it would have a pharmacological action in its own right . What is the action of P. Harmala all by itself ? "
On page 300 he talks about P.Harmala also containing a chemical called vasicine wich is an acetylcholinesterase inhibiter .
He says:-
"This ( acetylcholinesterase ) is the bodys detoxifying operater for getting the neurotransmitter acetylcholine out of the synapses when it is no longer needed to conduct a signal from one nerve to another . If the transmitter can not be destroyed after it has functioned , the nerve system keeps firing and produces what is called parasympathetic toxicity . There can be cardiac depression , vasodilation and the flow of saliva and tears . Anticholinergics ( like vasicine ) are members of a pharmacological classification that includes the best of our insecticides and nerve gasses . "
= The first Shulgin quote says it doesnt work and the second gives an example of what realy could be happening .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the point that A.Shulgin brought up:-
"If P.Harmala can directly contribute to the action of another drug by some process other than that of potentiation or synergism , or simply allowing this other drug to become oraly active due to its presence , then it would have a pharmacological action in its own right . What is the action of P. Harmala all by itself ? "
From "The encyclopedia of psychoactive plants" by C.Rätsch on pages 837 and 838 . In 1969 a chilean psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo said that harmala alkaloids were psychoactive , Rätsch says is questionable if they realy are psychoactive , that this is not believed by the most experementalists who believe that he was talking about ayahuasca and not harmala alkaloids alone . Rätsch also talks about harmala self experiments to prove psychoactivity by Maurer , Lamparter and Dittrich which ended with the same negative results , as did the experiments by J.Ott in "Pharmacothean" and A.Shulgin in "Tihkal" .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I say :-
1:- There is no scientific proof that taking P.Harmala with Psilocybin has any other potentiating effects than psychelogical and / or toxic ones .
2:- If P.Harmala potentiates psilocybin why doesnt it potentiate a smaler than normaly halucinogenic dose to make it psychoactive ? = Why doesnt it potentiate .1 or .5 of a gramm of P.Semilanceata to make it psychoactive ?
I say , and i say the experts / quotes i mention say :-
That psilocybin has no problem geting to the brain
That psilocybin is "invisible" to the MAO reaction because of stearic hinderance = Psilocybin is ignored by MAO because of its "tail" .
That Peganum harmala has no psychedelic / psychoactive effects on its own .
That Peganum harmala has toxic effects . MAOIs block the brains mechanism for destroying and / or re-uptaking serotonine , causing , amongst other things , Maligned Serotonin Syndrome .
That Peganum harmala has psychelogical effects .
That if we havent eaten for four hours previously there is nothing in the stomach that P.Harmala / MAOIs can react with to cause the Psilocybin / Psilocin to work more .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are what you eat . George oshiwa . What have you been eating........
Love GOD