FluidDruid, you have studied the Empirical fundamentalism quite well. But have you applied that
theory to you, as a psychonaut ? why would you want to confuse/amplify your senses with psychedelics/substances/drugs, when, in the end, you only infere what you percieve ? Could it be because we also have inherent ideas in ourselves which aren't a consequence of a specific experience/perception ? That would lead us to reverse the process: we want to perceive what we infere.
From what i understood, you claimed that altered sense-data would lead to alternate realities. Then,you say a colour-blind would be in the same reality than me. I completely missed that point, please explain better.
We are heading off-topic here. This is about the soul, and not about the senses. Please remain objective and straight. What has the soul to do with it ? Where is it, then ? What is it ?
"If our souls are byproducts of the brain, or of the chemistry, could a soul be programmed into a computer ? Could it be synthetized in a lab ? If i ate the right ingredients, could i shit a soul ? "
No, No, No, and No.
Explain why. "No" is a reply that 5 year-olds give when they don't want to bathe. Why can't i synthetize a soul ? Are we different from laboratory compounds ? And if we are, why are the psychedelics able to be produced in a lab, altering our senses, and leading to alternate realities (from what i understood from your post - please write with linearlity), making us reach conclusions about the soul itself ?
What are you doing on this forum?
I'm living a second life, comfortably in my sofa.
Forkbender, if I were you, i'd stay away from Descartes. He was being payed by the Church, worked in the army and belived that the universe was a big, very tuned upright machine.