If that news is entirely true, then the Netherlands have an almost stricter law on shrooms than Germany - that is some really bad news... German law so far allowed the import of fresh shrooms from the Netherlands because they were legal in the Netherlands (and therefore couldn't be illegal in Germany because both countries are EU and one can't make a product illegal that the other sells freely as a food product, something like that).
When the press become a choir singing exactly the same song it proves that the press is not free and that the people behind it have made desisions that the people have to be manipulated with christian ? / fashist / nazi propoganda.
It doesn't mean the press is not free in an "1984" Orwellian sense, it only means they are not free to really investigate and research because they don't have the time to do so. I know how it works in an editorial office of a tv station - the editors read the papers, then someone says "hey, paper XY has this news on how dangerous shrooms are, we gotta make something of that, too!" Then one of the editors, favorably one who has absolutely no knowledge about drugs, is assigned to make a 1 to 1:30 minutes piece about the dangers of shrooms - favorably a very lurid piece so that people will watch it and not zap to another channel. The time to complete the piece is at max. 6 hours including research, interview(s), getting enough footage, and editing. 6 hours might sound mighty fine to research, but you mustn't underestimate how much time it takes to shoot interviews and footage and then edit the whole thing - 6 hours is almost not enough to do that part right.
As you can imagine, the research that goes into some "news" like that is 1. repeating what the newspaper article said and 2. repeating what the obvious expert says (which is where the newspaper article came from in the first place).
A few months ago two teenagers in my town nearly killed themselves by drinking too much GHB after consumption of alcohol. All the media reported that they had almost killed themselves with "ecstasy in liquid form". That information came from the press people of the public health department, because they themselves didn't know the difference between GHB (gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid) with the misleading street name "liquid ecstasy" and real ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine or mdma) - the latter of which never occurs in liquid form (at least I never heard of it).
You can't really blame the editor of repeating such mis-information because they probably don't know shit about drugs and have to finish that piece in a matter of a few hours (for tv - for radio make it half an hour to slightly re-phrase the official press statement)
What I wanna say is that, no, there is not some fascist conspiration behind the media, but the effects are just the same. Every station only works for the highest quota, everyone wants to be faster than the others, but every executive tries to minimize costs - so there's always less people than would be necessary to make news in less time than would be necessary in a more lurid fashion than what it actually is.
There is news agencies out there who advertise that they will always be 10 seconds faster than Reuters. Nobody cares if they hire underpaid students to make the impossible happen - 10 seconds faster is their claim, you can imagine how that affects the quality of news... it's all going down in a spiral towards news-hell...