"You can't artificially assemble atoms to create a human body."
Its not logically impossible, and once you get to the point of putting together nucleotides, adding polymerase in a stable, controlled environment (like inside a lipid bilayer), then you've got something which might tentatively be called life, which will, with the right selection pressures, turn into what we recognise as human... I admit its more complex than that, but to say it "can't" be done seems a bit naive.
***
Me: "Just because it doesn't deny eternal existence doesn't mean it proves it."
You:"Did I say it should?"
->
You previously: "Life can not be created, only passed on." (read as: life is eternal.)
Me previously :" give us your *theory* as to why it *is* possible for life to have always existed."
You previously: "I'm glad you asked. Check it out (and take your time!): Nassim Haramein's Unified Field Theory."
So to answer the question of "did you say nassim does prove eternal existence" .. it would seem so...
***
"Point the leaps out please."
Ok, I don't want to take to long with this, its a completely irrelevant tangent in my opinion, but few to start off with, then move on to coriolis and denity waves.
In one of the videos he mentions all sorts of wacky stuff like "the tetrahedron inside the sphere" - I know what tetrahedrons are, I know what spheres are, but I don't know what relevance they have and what its got to do with Jupiter... I'm inclined to think it doesn't have anything to do with jupiter, but you can just call that my sceptical side kicking in...
Coriolis* "force" (actually an apparent effect)... in space(!), coriolis force isn't even real in the normal sense of the word, its an apparent effect caused by your perspective, and requires a rotating *body* like a solid planet. what you see in galaxies is likely something called "density waves" and as far as I'm aware, there's no reason to believe there is torsion on a universal scale.
But even *if* by some magic all of the above weren't true, coriolis effect wouldn't really have *enough* of an effect to change anything meaningful about the way the universe works.
I think that's a pretty good start, the entire paper relies on torsion and coriolis if I've read it properly, Dante and st. bot also pointed out some other areas too.
Are you *now* convinced this nassim character is on the wrong track?
for reference if your interested:
Coriolis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect
Coriolis and density:
http://www.nap.edu/jhp/oneuniverse/motion_34-35.html
Density Wave Theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_wave_theory
Can we finally draw a line under this?
***
My opinion on CERN:
I think CERN is one of the most noble efforts of human existence so far (there isn't much competition for noble human deeds, granted): breaking down national barriers in the name of truth and cooperation - finally humans are starting to work together as a species, its not stopping world poverty, but its a start, and that sort of behaviour should be encouraged.
^that is perhaps an idealised and simplistic version of what CERN's about, but on the whole I think it counts.
***
Mushies? Where?!!