Caduceus Mercurius
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 14/7/07
- Messages
- 9 628
Subtances like mescaline, LSD and psilocybine used to be described as hallucinogens, but since this term was too vague and applied to many other substances as well, some scholars have suggested another name for this particular subgroup: psychedelics. Later another term was coined to express their spiritual rather than psychological usage: entheogens. Indeed, the term psychedelic had become vague too, now referring to types of art and music. With the discovery of MDMA, a more precise name was needed, which resulted in the terms entactogen and empathogen.
In practice the word psychonaut clearly refers to those who use entheogenic substances for their personal development. A Hungarian movie named Psychonaut discusses the use of psychoactive drugs for spiritual purposes. The Psychonaut website is clearly related to the use of drugs, especially the empathogenic and psychedelic ones, the ones also used in either therapeutic or religious contexts. Within both the Psychonaut movie and the Psychonaut website there is also talk about meditation, sensory deprivation, drumming and the like, but it's almost always related to the psychedelic experience and its influence.
But according to the Wikipedia page, and the opinion of some psychonauts themselves, the term may also apply to people who expand their mind while principally abstaining from entheogens. They may either abstain because it's not part of their tradition, or for some other reason. The point is: they have not and will not undergo a psychedelic experience in their life, but through their personal efforts they somehow also "sail the psyche" and thus may rightly be described as psychonauts. From this perspective the Dalai Lama may be said to be a psychonaut. Some consider the word psychonaut as some kind of honerary title, and thus conclude it's offensive to not consider the a particular religious hero a psychonaut. To say "Mahatma Gandhi was not a psychonaut" sounds derogatory, but it depends on how strictly you define "psychonaut".
Though I fully acknowledge that intellectual, emotional and spiritual growth are possible through many ways other than the psychedelic or entheogenic experience (reading! discussing! meditating! loving!), I also feel like the group of spiritually inclined drug users, the tryptamine users, deserves a term of its own. For a long time I thought psychonaut was such a term, much more specific than the broad term "shaman", which some insist only applies to reputed medicine men.
So what do you all think? Should we try to reclaim the term psychonaut for the specific subgroup of inner explorers who are well-versed in psychedelic thought and action? Or do you think we should be "broadminded" and water down the meaning to anyone engaged in a mentally uplifting activity (such as watching Dr.Phil or going to yoga class every Thursday night)?
Is "drug-using psychonaut" a redundancy, or should we add "drug-using" to specify a subgroup?
If you think the term psychonaut should have a broad application, please suggest terms I could use in my writing to refer to people who consider the psychedelic drug induced experience the sine qua non of their spiritual practice and experience?
Or do you think such a strict term would be undesirable, even if there is a group that is rather dedicated or even fanatical to the inclusion of drugs in spiritual practice?
In practice the word psychonaut clearly refers to those who use entheogenic substances for their personal development. A Hungarian movie named Psychonaut discusses the use of psychoactive drugs for spiritual purposes. The Psychonaut website is clearly related to the use of drugs, especially the empathogenic and psychedelic ones, the ones also used in either therapeutic or religious contexts. Within both the Psychonaut movie and the Psychonaut website there is also talk about meditation, sensory deprivation, drumming and the like, but it's almost always related to the psychedelic experience and its influence.
But according to the Wikipedia page, and the opinion of some psychonauts themselves, the term may also apply to people who expand their mind while principally abstaining from entheogens. They may either abstain because it's not part of their tradition, or for some other reason. The point is: they have not and will not undergo a psychedelic experience in their life, but through their personal efforts they somehow also "sail the psyche" and thus may rightly be described as psychonauts. From this perspective the Dalai Lama may be said to be a psychonaut. Some consider the word psychonaut as some kind of honerary title, and thus conclude it's offensive to not consider the a particular religious hero a psychonaut. To say "Mahatma Gandhi was not a psychonaut" sounds derogatory, but it depends on how strictly you define "psychonaut".
Though I fully acknowledge that intellectual, emotional and spiritual growth are possible through many ways other than the psychedelic or entheogenic experience (reading! discussing! meditating! loving!), I also feel like the group of spiritually inclined drug users, the tryptamine users, deserves a term of its own. For a long time I thought psychonaut was such a term, much more specific than the broad term "shaman", which some insist only applies to reputed medicine men.
So what do you all think? Should we try to reclaim the term psychonaut for the specific subgroup of inner explorers who are well-versed in psychedelic thought and action? Or do you think we should be "broadminded" and water down the meaning to anyone engaged in a mentally uplifting activity (such as watching Dr.Phil or going to yoga class every Thursday night)?
Is "drug-using psychonaut" a redundancy, or should we add "drug-using" to specify a subgroup?
If you think the term psychonaut should have a broad application, please suggest terms I could use in my writing to refer to people who consider the psychedelic drug induced experience the sine qua non of their spiritual practice and experience?
Or do you think such a strict term would be undesirable, even if there is a group that is rather dedicated or even fanatical to the inclusion of drugs in spiritual practice?