Finarfin
Sale drogué·e
- Inscrit
- 20/7/13
- Messages
- 798
Psyche101 a dit:Pinchbeck also never predicted that anything would "change in 2012", he just jumped on the bandwagon that Terence Mckenna started. So you are just attacking strawman arguments that noone ever made.
Mckenna's "timewave" theory was strained and artificial, by contrast the "novelty theory" was a very powerful and tightly argued theory.
This is irrelevant to what you said before, where you falsely claimed that someone was predicting that something would "change in 2012". Nobody ever made such a claim afaik, including Mckenna. You are "bashing" yourself, by revealing that you have spent years reading Mckenna but you never understood what he was actually saying. That would make me feel really stupid.
His brother Dennis never came up with any original material of his own relating to psychedelics or 2012 or whatever, everything Dennis ever said about these issues was simply plagiarised from Terence. Dennis spent his entire career riding his brother's coattails and pretending to be more serious and scientific, when in fact he was just bereft of any originality.
you obviously weren't paying much attention while you were reading/listening if you came away with the idea fixed in your head that Mckenna had predicted that something would "change in 2012". I suggest you go back and read/listen more carefully to what Mckenna was actually saying, to clear up your confusion.
You can blindly insist this as much as you like, but you would not be able to substantiate this claim with actual quotes, because it is false. Neither Pinchbeck nor Mckenna (or anyone else afaik) ever predicted that anything would "change in 2012". You have completely misunderstood Mckenna's novelty theory.
If you really believe your own nonsense, try to actually find some quote from Mckenna, Pinchbeck or whoever where they predict that something will change in 2012. You wont be able to find anything because that was never what Mckenna claimed. I pity your ignorance.
Really? Who are these people? Can you give specific examples of people who “predicted shit was going to happen” on 21/12/2012? I somehow doubt it.
Nothing happened on that date, and nobody had ever predicted that something was going to happen on this date. You have completely misunderstood what novelty theory was getting at, it was about the evolution of complexity in the universe, not about some "event" that was "predicted to happen in 2012".
Believed what exactly?
You are a victim of your own lack of intelligence, you have drastically misunderstood the whole point of what you call "the 2012 phenomenon". This says a lot about you, but it says nothing about people like Mckenna or Pinchbeck.
I got the impression that you do not know what you are talking about. You obviously did not pay attention when reading Mckenna.
Mckenna came up with the timewave zero. I personally think this whole idea of the timewave is nonsens.
Mckenna talked about the end of history and the singularity (transcendental object) at the end of time. According to his timewave this would all happen on 21 december 2012. Mckenna had many different scenarios for 2012 none of which came true.
You can try to attack me by questioning my intelligence but i am not impressed by this sort of attacks.
Saying that i am stupid comes from a lack of a solid argument. I know what i am talking about and you obviously don,t know what you are talking about.
The titel of one of pinchbecks books is: 2012 The Return of Quetzalcoatl. In this book Pinchbeck writes about how in 2012 quetzalcoatl will return. Yes pinchbeck jumped up this 2012 bandwagon.
However nothing happened in 2012. there was no return of quetzalcoaltl. Pinchbeck also said that in 2012 was going to be a shift in human evolution. There was no shift in human evolution what so ever. The whole meaning of the word evolution is slow change.
I think pinchbeck jumped on this bandwagon because of sensationalism.
Machine elves, aliens,ufo,s, maya gods returning, timewave, 2012, it,s sensationalism.
It,s a known fact that Mckenna talked a lot about mushrooms, but did not used any mushroom himselfs from 1988 till he died.
Mckenna himself said that he was no guru and that people should not believe what he had to say. Mckenna himself said that people should think for themselves so why should i believe mckenna and copie his ideas blindly.
Pinchbeck wrote a book with the titel: 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl.
He features in various television programs on 2012.
He was the moderator of the 2012 tipping point prophets conference.
Pinchbeck claimed that we are experiencing a global shift in evolution or in other words a global consciousness transformation that would reach it,s peak in 2012. Pinchbeck also talked about the galactic alignment.
Pinchbeck as well as Mckenna do not use research or science to back up there claims.
Pinchbeck got his information on 2012 from visions not science. Another 2012 propagandist was David Wilcock. Wilcock got his information from a extradimensional entity. Mckenna got the idea of his timewave zero from a mushroom that talked to him, not from logic science or research.
There is a bit by the late comedian George Carlin that,s all about religion and how religion starts. The bit is called the 10 Commandments.
About 5,000 years ago a bunch of religious and political hustlers got together to try to figure out how to control people and keep them in line. They knew people were basically stupid and would believe anything they were told, so they announced that God had given them some commandments, up on a mountain, when no one was around.
I think it,s the same with 2012. People like wilcock pinchbeck and mckenna get this information not from science they get this information in a vision (on a mountain when no one was around)
So my question is why should i take this shit serious.
I think this sort of stuff is hurting the psychedelic community. I think that non psychedelic users will look at psychedelic users as a bunch of lunatics because of stuff like this.