Pinchbeck also never predicted that anything would "change in 2012", he just jumped on the bandwagon that Terence Mckenna started. So you are just attacking strawman arguments that noone ever made.
Mckenna's "timewave" theory was strained and artificial, by contrast the "novelty theory" was a very powerful and tightly argued theory.
Finarfin a dit:
It may sound like i am trying to bash mckenna. I am not trying to bash the guy. I read all his books and enjoyed listening to his talks.
Mckenna had some interresting things to say. We also must remember that mckenna was like a modern bard who entertaint people with his talks.
This is irrelevant to what you said before, where you falsely claimed that someone was predicting that something would "change in 2012". Nobody ever made such a claim afaik, including Mckenna. You are "bashing" yourself, by revealing that you have spent years reading Mckenna but you never understood what he was actually saying. That would make me feel really stupid.
Finarfin a dit:
I like mckenna as a artist or a entertainer. When it comes to knowledge and information i much more prefere to listen to his brother.
His brother Dennis never came up with any original material of his own relating to psychedelics or 2012 or whatever, everything Dennis ever said about these issues was simply plagiarised from Terence. Dennis spent his entire career riding his brother's coattails and pretending to be more serious and scientific, when in fact he was just bereft of any originality.
Finarfin a dit:
I have read all mckenna, s books and i listend to most of his talks.
you obviously weren't paying much attention while you were reading/listening if you came away with the idea fixed in your head that Mckenna had predicted that something would "change in 2012". I suggest you go back and read/listen more carefully to what Mckenna was actually saying, to clear up your confusion.
Finarfin a dit:
People like daniel pinchbeck (for example) have been predicting change.
I think it, s a joke that you say people did not predict change in 2012.
You can blindly insist this as much as you like, but you would not be able to substantiate this claim with actual quotes, because it is false. Neither Pinchbeck nor Mckenna (or anyone else afaik) ever predicted that anything would "change in 2012". You have completely misunderstood Mckenna's novelty theory.
If you really believe your own nonsense, try to actually find some quote from Mckenna, Pinchbeck or whoever where they predict that something will change in 2012. You wont be able to find anything because that was never what Mckenna claimed. I pity your ignorance.
Finarfin a dit:
Before 2012 a lot of people where talking about it and a lot of people where predicting shit was going to happen at this date.
Really? Who are these people? Can you give specific examples of people who “predicted shit was going to happen” on 21/12/2012? I somehow doubt it.
Finarfin a dit:
We all know that nothing happened, but when you ask people like pinchbeck about it, they do not give a straight answer.
Nothing happened on that date, and nobody had ever predicted that something was going to happen on this date. You have completely misunderstood what novelty theory was getting at, it was about the evolution of complexity in the universe, not about some "event" that was "predicted to happen in 2012".
Finarfin a dit:
You try to deny that there was a 2012 phenomonon. You try to deny that a lot of people talked about it and believed it. I know why you try to deny it. You deny it because it, s 2014 and nothing happened 21 dec 2012.
Believed what exactly?
You are a victim of your own lack of intelligence, you have drastically misunderstood the whole point of what you call "the 2012 phenomenon". This says a lot about you, but it says nothing about people like Mckenna or Pinchbeck.