Global consciousness
- Auteur de la discussion ????????
- Date de début
Interesting!
Imagine if the universe and all that was in it is actually the inside of our creators mind..... :shock:
I suddenly had a very strange thought as soon as I looked at them pictures, What if etherium gold and other mon-atomic preciuos metals give the user the ability to create such a universe by creating the double spiral vortex pattern in the mind or what is Known by physicists as "the birth of matter from energy", this double vortex pattern is thought by scientists to be the pattern through which all life is created.
I took my info about the double vortex pattern from research done on etherium gold - http://www.energeticnutrition.com/hi/gold.html
What if these metals give the user the ability to create a universe........ :shock:
:shock: :shock:
Im only theorizing on information I have collected over the years, Im gonna be thinking about this for a while now :? :lol:
Peace out, Stay safe,
Sticki
Imagine if the universe and all that was in it is actually the inside of our creators mind..... :shock:
I suddenly had a very strange thought as soon as I looked at them pictures, What if etherium gold and other mon-atomic preciuos metals give the user the ability to create such a universe by creating the double spiral vortex pattern in the mind or what is Known by physicists as "the birth of matter from energy", this double vortex pattern is thought by scientists to be the pattern through which all life is created.
I took my info about the double vortex pattern from research done on etherium gold - http://www.energeticnutrition.com/hi/gold.html
What if these metals give the user the ability to create a universe........ :shock:
:shock: :shock: Im only theorizing on information I have collected over the years, Im gonna be thinking about this for a while now :? :lol:
Peace out, Stay safe,
Sticki
instead of saying everything is alive, i would rather say everything is dead.
(without thinking about the connotation in the word "dead")
EVERYTHING that happens is a consequence from something that has been done in the past. think about determinism, the denial of "the free mind".
actually, everything we consider alive, consists of molecules and chemical reactions, of which we know the mechanism.
about comparing the human body to the world (cells = humans):
in evolutional terms, human needs are competition and survival,
cells have a cooperative nature.
in order to create a superbeing out of a whole human population, there must be a perfect system of society first... so we have a looong way to go...
(without thinking about the connotation in the word "dead")
EVERYTHING that happens is a consequence from something that has been done in the past. think about determinism, the denial of "the free mind".
actually, everything we consider alive, consists of molecules and chemical reactions, of which we know the mechanism.
about comparing the human body to the world (cells = humans):
in evolutional terms, human needs are competition and survival,
cells have a cooperative nature.
in order to create a superbeing out of a whole human population, there must be a perfect system of society first... so we have a looong way to go...
buffachino
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 7/6/07
- Messages
- 1 452
You talk about determinism as an instance of causality; a phenomenon that is as much a myth as time itself. For there is no actual transitory of past to present and on to a future, that itself is determined by the conjunction of culminations from one conglomeration to the next as perceived by a finite observer; we are in infinite perpetual present, only the perception of this space compared to the culminations of matter, being and the observer themselves dictate perceived median change.
Who dictates when a cycle or process ends or begins? Does the perceived quasi-dimensional past drive the present into the future? Does a tail wag a dog, does the wake of a boat drive the boat forward to its destination, or are all these phenomena resultant ripples of knowledge from the occurrence of felt experience itself?
Time does not move, for it simply does not exist. All being moves around a single infinite point of present within and throughout itself.
Everything is certainly alive, even ‘death’ itself is life, pure life, infinity; the nexus for all existence, novelty and experience. Our perception and indeed waking physical experience of life is but one point of perception along an infinite scale. Just because the assembly of substance that constitutes everything that is conventionally, and erroneously, considered alive on our scale does not mean that this same systemic coalescence of entity does not extend into infinity on both ends of the spectrum in comparison to us as finite observers within boundless dimension. This is the essence of the universe; infinite experience of endless novelty between infinity and finite perception.
And again; we do not resemble a coexistent cellular structure of a healthy macro-entity, for we have become through our own damnation, a malignant cancer of the earth; born out of purity but tainted by the internal corruption of our union, intent, wisdom and purpose.
Peace.
Who dictates when a cycle or process ends or begins? Does the perceived quasi-dimensional past drive the present into the future? Does a tail wag a dog, does the wake of a boat drive the boat forward to its destination, or are all these phenomena resultant ripples of knowledge from the occurrence of felt experience itself?
Time does not move, for it simply does not exist. All being moves around a single infinite point of present within and throughout itself.
Everything is certainly alive, even ‘death’ itself is life, pure life, infinity; the nexus for all existence, novelty and experience. Our perception and indeed waking physical experience of life is but one point of perception along an infinite scale. Just because the assembly of substance that constitutes everything that is conventionally, and erroneously, considered alive on our scale does not mean that this same systemic coalescence of entity does not extend into infinity on both ends of the spectrum in comparison to us as finite observers within boundless dimension. This is the essence of the universe; infinite experience of endless novelty between infinity and finite perception.
And again; we do not resemble a coexistent cellular structure of a healthy macro-entity, for we have become through our own damnation, a malignant cancer of the earth; born out of purity but tainted by the internal corruption of our union, intent, wisdom and purpose.
Peace.
I think there's a difference between empathy and actually sharing the same feelings and knowledge.
When someone who you know has a family member die, you feel sad, but you'll forget, and in a week, you wont be thinking about it. I think if we were connected in even the smallest way a close but impersonal death might generate those personal feelings that stay with you for months.
The more I think about it, the more alone I feel. :tear:
When someone who you know has a family member die, you feel sad, but you'll forget, and in a week, you wont be thinking about it. I think if we were connected in even the smallest way a close but impersonal death might generate those personal feelings that stay with you for months.
The more I think about it, the more alone I feel. :tear:
@buffachino:
I would say time does exist, but that it goes in 2 directions.
"music is not recorded upon a tape untill someone listens to that tape"
(what the bleep do we know)
our brain is just way too simple, we can only think in one direction
i think time is something static, only observations "move on the line of time"
I would say time does exist, but that it goes in 2 directions.
"music is not recorded upon a tape untill someone listens to that tape"
(what the bleep do we know)
our brain is just way too simple, we can only think in one direction
i think time is something static, only observations "move on the line of time"
The experience of being one is a paradox. Every trip is as unique as the person experiencing it although it's a universal journey.
One thing that these deep entheogenic experiences have been teaching me, is that death is not something to be afraid of. It's not that the connection between us all isn't there, it's that we are mostly not aware of it. Once you start to re-establish the connection with your deepest Self, and consequence of that is becoming aware of the fact that we are all one, almost as a byproduct. The more that realization starts to get hold, the more sense all those stories of shamanic cultures that claim to have contact with their ancestors, start to make. It's easy for us western people to completely oversee the claim that those guys are making for thousands of years: they are talking to ancestors which are basically dead people.
In those cultures, a lot of effort is put in the phenomenon of guiding diseased people to 'the light', actually making the transfer more easy and natural for them. The Tibetan book of the death is a beautiful example of this since that culture is basically evolved from a mix of shaman ism and bud ism.
We are alone, yet we are many, this is the great paradox of the one that became many, playing the game of God rediscovering herself over and over again, in a timeless divine play where the name of the game seems to be to become aware of who we really are and what we actually can do.
L&P
HC
One thing that these deep entheogenic experiences have been teaching me, is that death is not something to be afraid of. It's not that the connection between us all isn't there, it's that we are mostly not aware of it. Once you start to re-establish the connection with your deepest Self, and consequence of that is becoming aware of the fact that we are all one, almost as a byproduct. The more that realization starts to get hold, the more sense all those stories of shamanic cultures that claim to have contact with their ancestors, start to make. It's easy for us western people to completely oversee the claim that those guys are making for thousands of years: they are talking to ancestors which are basically dead people.
In those cultures, a lot of effort is put in the phenomenon of guiding diseased people to 'the light', actually making the transfer more easy and natural for them. The Tibetan book of the death is a beautiful example of this since that culture is basically evolved from a mix of shaman ism and bud ism.
We are alone, yet we are many, this is the great paradox of the one that became many, playing the game of God rediscovering herself over and over again, in a timeless divine play where the name of the game seems to be to become aware of who we really are and what we actually can do.
L&P
HC
Brugmansia
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 2/11/06
- Messages
- 4 372
HeartCore a dit:
I agree completely with this.
Many religions are trying with massive pressure to convince the individual that there is only one path after life or not, objection is strictly taboo and takes away all the space for one to decide his/her own path.
Rather than trying to put one convinced path into the mind of the individual of what's present for him/her after life, the world could better operate as one, ease the transfer to death for each other with love and support, with a free desicion for everyone where he/she goes to, or not.
G
Guest
Guest
"Anyone who gives you a belief system is your enemy"
Osho
Osho
buffachino
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 7/6/07
- Messages
- 1 452
Heres a nice video of Alan Watts, discussing the concepts of static, infinite present and the fallacy of causality and time itself. Enjoy!
http://deoxy.org/watch?v=6368221056648919499&q=time&list=*&target=vid&s=1&m=1&small=1&
http://deoxy.org/watch?v=6368221056648919499&q=time&list=*&target=vid&s=1&m=1&small=1&
I feel alone amongst most people. It's not that they are very mean or I constantly reject people's attention, it's just that I don't have much in common with people I'm usually surrounded by. They all get drunk and try their best to get laid, while I'm my happiest walking freely looking at flowers, or spreading hugs and going over notary* objects of discussion. They can be ill-spirited, but I'm too much of a pacifist (I'll get in people's faces, and have a tendency of telling people what I think of them to their faces) to hurt, steal or anything of that sort. It's within my beliefs that everyone has the capacity to be the way that the true I am like, but almost no one seems to see it or act it.
I've evolved, it seems, from their state to mine. I've grown younger.
*to me
I've evolved, it seems, from their state to mine. I've grown younger.
*to me
OK I saw the video you posted, buffachino, and saw some more on youtube and then read a lot of essays and speakings of Alan Watts and well... what can I say, I liked the guy from the first second, he speaks of this very complex topics like he were talking about the simplest thing there is and, I really like that, he puts it directly, like it is, makes it sound so obvious. Thanks for sharing! 
I really hope one day I'll be able to express myself so well as even a 20% of Alan Watts' potential :lol:
Could you recommend me some books of him? there are a lot, I don't know where to start.
I really hope one day I'll be able to express myself so well as even a 20% of Alan Watts' potential :lol:
Could you recommend me some books of him? there are a lot, I don't know where to start.
G
Guest
Guest
????????, Alan Watts is perhaps my favourite psychedelic writer. search in bit torrent sites and you will find much of him. "the joyous cosmology", "psychedelics and religious experience", " the book on the taboo against knowing who you are". "the new alchemy", "the soul-searchers", "the world as emptiness". those can give you a real nice perspective of Watts' thought. they are pretty small, since he wrote very directly and without much romance. oh, and read "from time to eternity", it is perhaps my favourite essay of him!
G
Guest
Guest
Rymmen a dit:
What's wrong with sex?
