Wow, long thread. Lots going on in here. I'll just add a short little post to throw my 2 cents into the mix.
----
I don't care for any religion, esspecially those that are organized with centers of religious authority (churches, temples, mosques, etc., with prechers, pastors, popes, cardinals, rabbi, imams, etc.) and those with a text or book that is generally taken to be correct for all time and generally cannot change (Bible, Qur'an, Torah, etc.).
These religions, while perhaps beautiful and respectible when taken only as a pure idea (though I only admit this is a possibility, I don't think even the pure "idea" form of any religion I know anything about is completely beautiful or respectible) always seem to fail when implemented by man/woman. Just as communism seems like a great idea but always seems to fail in practice, so too does religion fail to spread good around the world.
Religions are like nationalism. "My country is the best and I will defend it to the death" sounds the same as "My religion is the 'one true religion' and I will defend it to the death," to me. They seem the same. Nationalism and religion serve to create those that are part of the particular country or religion and those that are not part of it and are against it.
Wars are then fought between those that beleive and those that do not. Sometimes the wars are direclty violent involving guns and bombs, countries and states. Sometimes the wars are indirectly violent. As one example, I think some Christians in the US support anti-drug laws which then cause police to use violent force against drug users and lock them up.
The implementations fail to live up to the ideal. I would like to see all religions go away.
----
That said, this thread is an obvious and particularly propogandist thread against islam those that practice it. At least, it sure started that way. It would be great if people would stop attacking a single relegion and make arguments against them all, IMHO.
If one is religious and attacking a single other religion, that person is exactly part of the problem I outline above, and likely a hippocrate as well.
If one is not religious and is attacking a single religion, I think they're missing the "forest for the trees" as the expression goes.