Dr. Leospace
Alpiniste Kundalini
- Inscrit
- 28/10/05
- Messages
- 686
UTHTURN a dit:This is substantially higher than the 30 reported for the Netherlands, although the 72 rate in Amsterdam comes rather closer. But this is not the whole story. Does lower criminal gun ownership translate to lower crime rates overall? Looking at the FBI data in table 1 on page 64, the violent crime rate in the US was 504.4 per 100,000 inhabitants, while property crime ran at 3656.1 per 100,000 inhabitants. The Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics has crime numbers online, but not the crime rate. The table shows 101,143 violent crimes and 919,262 property crimes in 2001. With a population of 16,171,520 (September 2002), this works out as 625.4 violent crimes per 100,000 people and 5684.4 proprety crimes. Or, to put it differently, the violent crime rate in the Netherlands in 24% higher than in the US, and the property crime rate is 55% higher.
Statistics and numbers can be interesting but they don't say everything, in this case a lot of information is missing. For example what is a violent crime? A punch in the face and a shot in the head are both counted as one violent crime.
I'm not saying the Netherlands is a safe country without any crime, but at least not many people carry firearms -I haven't seen anyone with a gun in my life-. And it is very hard to get them, the change of getting shot by some freaking out person is smaller. I think it is as simple as that. The more guns the more problems, accidents and killings.
Some statistics seems to be on my side:
http://www.guncontrol.ca/Content/international.html