Which book would you burn.

[BrainEater]

"the question is, why you think that your truth is worth more, or the right one?"

Your waffeling again . Do i do that ? Or do you ? Did i say that my thoughts are right ? I just asked questions about what you call tolerance . Cant you stop talking around things and twisting what i say . Cant you answer direct questions in a direct and concrete way ?

you can't yourself.


peace.

 

[GOD]

"Communication is a matter of interpretation. And interpretation lies in the responsibility of the receiver. From my point of view, I am very clear, concrete and direct. Others seem not to be bothered either. So yes, it could be all my fault. But maybe it is yours? Or maybe it is neither mine, nor yours, or our both. And maybe we are not meant to communicate. *shrug*"

Your waffeling again . Answering clear , concrete questions with clear concrete answers works for the whole academic world and most people . Language is a matter of interpretatiopn and personal definition , but not to the extent that you are insinuating . Then saying others dont seem to be bothered is another cop out . To know that you would have to have heard all peoples opinions on the subject . As far as the rest of your asumptions and excuses are concerned , maybe its that you just cant explain what you say .
The bit about maybe we are not ment to comunicate is another excuse .

"Here, since as a receiver, it is my responsibility. and I admit, that I might have misinterpreted your use of the word tolerance in this particular case (your answer to braineaters post), because I only realized later, that you both were referring to a very special and circumstantial case."

I was asking about concrete details of what you call tolerance is . And you still havent answered me . I was pointing out that tolerance is good in certain limited cases but that most of the time when people talk about tolerance they are playing an ego game , pretending that they have the right to decide to tolerate the bad behaviour of others . For example when someone says that they tolerate homosexuality , when it has nothing to do with them what others do . That they dont have the right to decide to tolerate it or not .

Brain eater your out of your depth . I have been direct and concrete in my statements and questions and have got no direct and concrete answers .

My last post on the subject .

 

[psm]

*shrug* I can't help you.
I did answer. I did not insinuate. And frankly, I don't really care at this point, whether you understand anything I say, or don't. I will keep conversing with the others here... you can keep on ranting, since it seems your favorite pastime and I don't mind you being happy...

My last post on the subject .

Didn't you just... ach never mind

 

[BrainEater]

obviously GOD doesn't understand the way you write. therefore he CAN'T (!!!!!!!) understand what you are trying to tell him.


PEACE. :weedman:

 

[psm]

obviously GOD doesn't understand the way you write. therefore he CAN'T (!!!!!!!) understand what you are trying to tell him.

My thought exactly!

 

[druglessdouglas]

what about authors. can we burn them? id like to burn Steven King for the Tommyknockers. just a bit

 

[psm]

what about authors. can we burn them? id like to burn Steven King for the Tommyknockers. just a bit

good choice! I would add some J. K. Rollins. Since she is a witch, she would float and thus burn quite good...

 

[druglessdouglas]

she weighs the same as a duck then. science.

 

[restin]

xD drugless, these guys deserve a place in heaven

 

[psm]

she weighs the same as a duck then. science.

:wink: