Psychoid a dit:
Are you implying that I am schizophrenic or psychotic?
yes.
We are all, up to a certain limit schizophrenic AND psychotic. Read Freud.
Psychoid a dit:
Why do you think we are all constantly talking nonsense and completely out of reality? Why did you put reality between ""'s?
What do you see when you read a newspaper, watch TV, or talk to the myriads of culturally programmed ones (not that I'm king of free will or anything...)?
Don't know about you but I see madness. I see madness when I read Aristotle, Homer, Shakespeare, and the rest of the history's brigade. Nonsense makes sense.
Psychoid a dit:
In a discordian rainbow way I was joking. You said you were confused tho you were sober; I just took credit for your confusion. :lol:
Nomada a dit:
Because you're ascribing a language construct to a real person.
I'll try make myself more clear:
It's like the concept of what is human being. If you define human being as some first, second, third and so forth characteristics (conditions) and you start probing REAL human beings you will end up with two very large groups, humans and non-humans, both groups nonetheless, with human bodies. The mistake of definition is that it is supposedly referring to some nature, essence, principle that doesn't change and this is utterly wrong: All things are not given, they are constantly produced BY means of the direct human experience and action both individually and collectively. All things are processes, the contact between what is and what is not [potentiality, probability, etc]. If you ascribe a language construct, a symbolical, virtual [in that it is imaginary] idea to real persons you are not being objective because you are defining a person through ideas and not human experiences, collective enterprises, complexity of the universe, etc.
Of course the voice is NEVER in unison given. Everyone can get pathological with themselves, and with the rest of his/her surroundings. But the rest can get pathological with yourself as well. The collective overmind (culture) theater is language and this means that WORDS CREATE OBJECTS-you can apprehend this by thinking that words and ideas obscure any supposed reality in that they condition how we observe (observer dependency for example, the subject of observatory in science which leads directly to get cetacean world of epipstemology). And so this type of boundary between sanity/insanity can, and it is, used to ALIENATE (like the other made-vulnerable groups I mentioned in the first post...).
We can get very insane, but is that because there is a place called insanity that some have gone to AND/OR is it because we created it and put lots of people that don't fit in the DOMINATING LOGIC of correctly living AND/OR is it because we created a space called insanity AND/OR....AND/OR....AND/OR...???
schizophrenics in some cultures are taken very lovingly and revered because they are thought of being closer to God.
I won't be posting for a while. I'm on 26 hours of classes a week. It has been fun until now guys, I love you very much. See you later when I have some spare time... :weedman:
Love and light.