???????? a dit:
thanks, but does this mean that if, for instance, I get a test and it tells me I'm HIV positive then there's nothing wrong with me???
Well...
That is THE THING... The wise beings are debating.
And when it comes to media surpressing real issuses. This is definetley one of those. And they surpress it in sutch a way so that the WARNINGSIGNS are there for the ones with open eyes and a mind set to see.
I mean, when for instance Kary Mullis, the groovy cool Nobelprize winner and scientist that 1993 got the price for his discovery of the PCR...
(The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technique widely used in molecular biology and this dicovery they use in the so called
HIV/AIDS test...)
But he himself says>>>
"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
So this is something that really deserves a more thourough look...
Read part from his book here - DANCING NAKED IN THE MIND FIELD>>>
THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT VS. THE TRUTHBook Excerpt
By Kary Mullis
Penthouse Sept. 1998
When I first heard in 1984 that Luc Montagnier of France's Pasteur Institute and Robert Gallo of America's National Institutes of Health had independently discovered that the retrovirus H.I.V. -- human immunodeficiency virus -- caused AIDS, I accepted it as just another scientific fact. It was a little out of my field of biochemistry, and these men were specialists in retroviruses.
Four years later I was working as a consultant at Specialty Labs in Santa Monica. Specialty was trying to develop a means of using P.C.R. [polymerase chain reaction, a D.N.A.-amplification method conceived by Mullis] to detect retroviruses in the thousands of blood donations received per day by the Red Cross. I was writing a report on our progress for the project sponsor, and I began by stating, "H.I.V. is the probable cause of AIDS."
I asked a virologist at Specialty where I could find the reference for H.I.V. being the cause of AIDS.
"You don't need a reference," he told me. "Everybody knows it."
"I'd like to quote a reference." I felt a little funny about not knowing the source of such an important discovery. Everyone else seemed to.
"Why don't you cite the C.D.C. report?" he suggested, giving me a copy of the Centers for Disease Control's periodic report on morbidity and mortality. I read it. It wasn't a scientific article. It simply said that an organism had been identified -- it did not say how. It requested that doctors report any patients showing certain symptoms and test them for antibodies to this organism. The report did not identify the original scientific work, but that didn't surprise me. It was intended for physicians, who didn't need to know the source of the information. Physicians assumed that if the C.D.C. was convinced, there must exist real proof somewhere that H.I.V. was the cause of AIDS.
READ more>>>
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/kmdancing.htm