Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, unfortunately they don't have a table for the sidereal zodiac, which is what I use and consider the 'real' zodiac. For me astrology is about numbers, not about the physical demarcations of the zodiac signs. For me it's a matter of dividing circles into 12 segments, and looking at aspects close to 60, 90 or 120 degrees, making divisional charts by dividing each house into three, nine or whatever many parts.Ahuaeynjxs a dit:Ah Astrology ! Have you tried to transpose to the real solar zodiac like the link I have posted ? I'm curious as to what conclusions you would reach...
Although I feel like a broken record with this one: the idea of scientific "proof" isn't this holy grail of absoluteness that alot of people assume. When Einstein put forward the *theory* of relativity he wasn't saying "this is the way it is, anyone who says otherwise is wrong, newtons work should be thrown out of the window", he was saying that parts of newtons work have to be reavaluated with the new information, and parts have now been *falsified* we still use the basis of Newton in a lot of work, but the things that have been demonstrated false, we throw out, the things we don't know we test.
Exactly! There is no 100% induction (except in mathematics) and therefore no absolute validation. Validation is relative :wink:The Theory of Gravity (as an example) is perfectly falsifiable - if you were to drop your keys, and they hovered, you can start to wonder if newton and einstein were such big shots.
CaduceusMercurius a dit:Hurray, the Sun is on the move again!!
Time for a celebration!
Merry Christmas everyone!!