Quoi de neuf ?

Bienvenue sur Psychonaut.fr !

Le forum des amateurs de drogues et des explorateurs de l'esprit

The sun has stopped !

  • Auteur de la discussion Auteur de la discussion Ahuaeynjxs
  • Date de début Date de début
"I wouldn't expect anything ; certainly not support and popularity".

Well you are realistic enough to see that . Why dont you go the next step in helping yourself and go to a psychiatrist .
 
Ahuaeynjxs a dit:
Ah Astrology ! Have you tried to transpose to the real solar zodiac like the link I have posted ? I'm curious as to what conclusions you would reach...
Well, unfortunately they don't have a table for the sidereal zodiac, which is what I use and consider the 'real' zodiac. For me astrology is about numbers, not about the physical demarcations of the zodiac signs. For me it's a matter of dividing circles into 12 segments, and looking at aspects close to 60, 90 or 120 degrees, making divisional charts by dividing each house into three, nine or whatever many parts.
 
Code:
Although I feel like a broken record with this one: the idea of scientific "proof" isn't this holy grail of absoluteness that alot of people assume. When Einstein put forward the *theory* of relativity he wasn't saying "this is the way it is, anyone who says otherwise is wrong, newtons work should be thrown out of the window", he was saying that parts of newtons work have to be reavaluated with the new information, and parts have now been *falsified* we still use the basis of Newton in a lot of work, but the things that have been demonstrated false, we throw out, the things we don't know we test.
If it is not absolute, then it is not a proof. Proof= undeniable, absolute. Yes, and today's scientists have reevaluated Einstein and future scientists will reevaluate today's scientists. What does it mean now? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. But there is no proof/evidence, there is just no falsification. Therefore there is no difference between science and pseudo-science except that one is what the mainstream believes and the other what the mainstream doesn't like.
 
actress-keira-knightley-515801.jpg


It was about time, after 7 pages with no cool down for our brains. :P
 
Now that's conclusive evidence!
 
Ahha ! Yes I'm still here :P

Definately conclusive evidence !

See how this woman's upper lip is tight and unable to express deep emotion ? Notice the assymetry of her eyebrows ? Notice how one of her collar bones is proeminent compared to the other ? Notice how her hips are thinned out and she has nothing even close to a budding belly ?

Well I don't know who she is ; I'm not saying she does not have the capacity to grow again , but she will most likely spend all her life in that shape if noone gives her a clue.

Thats the type of woman you will not see in my realm ! Notice how I cannot judge her spirit, she might be a superbly intelligent individual, but she would not enter my house simply because of her body appearance. Ascension can be easily told by judging the body according to simple logics. (we call this the Ophanim mask)

I understand what you mean CM , I never studied much the indian astrology since I tought it was related to the tropical zodiac, but now thank to you I see that it is the holographic earth zodiac, dodecahedra is the last of the platonic solids, this makes sense.

But the solar astrology superposes and even tho it has less influence, what you might find from it is more useful pertaining to your children since they do not have yet the maturity to grasp language of light significance, consciousness in that perspective is able to expand the hologram and envelop one side of the dodeca, giving purpose and function to the holographic earth zodiac.

Your courage is duely noted !
 
"If it is not absolute, then it is not a proof. Proof= undeniable, absolute."

"proof (pr?f) (n.)
The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.

The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
A statement or argument used in such a validation.

The state of being convinced or persuaded by consideration of evidence."

Proof has nothing to do with absolutes: more to do with validation. So you could instead say that "great claims require great validation"

The place we are at the moment is ahead of where we were, and behind where we will be, assuming there are people willing to refine our knowledge through quality controled means.

The Theory of Gravity (as an example) is perfectly falsifiable - if you were to drop your keys, and they hovered, you can start to wonder if newton and einstein were such big shots.
 
If proof is what is valid, than non-proof is what is not valid. Which leads to the statement, that everything that is not invalid is proof. Which leads us to 1000 of 1000 possibilities, from which we all have to chose. You cannot prove that there is no God and you therefore need to say, that the claim that God exists is valid. So is the claim, that there are aliens. And so is Gravity. And who decides, what is now the most valid proof? It is the majority and no one else. The validation if Thor, Jehowa, Nature or electricity caused the thunder lies only in the decision of the majority, as you cannot disprove that any of them caused the thunder.
The Theory of Gravity (as an example) is perfectly falsifiable - if you were to drop your keys, and they hovered, you can start to wonder if newton and einstein were such big shots.
Exactly! There is no 100% induction (except in mathematics) and therefore no absolute validation. Validation is relative :wink:
 
"Isn't usable truth aleady here ?

Eat whole foods, make sure your water is pure, grow shrooms, grow a grail, grow some cannabis, grow some cactus... "


How do you know your water is pure without science?
Cacti and cannabis don't let you connect to the internet, doesn't cure pneumonia (as far as I'm aware), doesn't create windfarms or collect the same level of energy.

I admit the need for more than science, but that doesn't mean science doesn't play a huge beneficial role in our lives - one which wouldn't be there if people listened to faith healers, or were satisfied about stories of "indigo children".


"I've watched similar videos with 10 times more content than this pathetic attempt at discrediting communication means. "

But you haven't actually tried to discuss the content have you?


"Are you really my elder Pariah ?"

I was using (semi) mock patronising tones in the context of the videos being used - I'm just a mere sprite of 23 years, although I wonder how much more you've actually done with your life, because it doesn't really sound like you know what the hell your talking about.


"Ask me any clear question, I will demystify its logic and purpose in your words."

Thankyou! I would appreciate it alot. You can start with the question I asked x number of pages ago:

".... what has DNA got to do with quantum tunneling? ...what has DNA got to do with donuts? ...what has quantum tunneling have to do with donuts?"
 
You caught my interest by not being in able to pull out her spirit through seeing the outlines of her body composition, Ahuaeynjxs.

It's true that she has made blocks and reflexes, which bounces everyone back who makes an attempt to dive into her spirit. She's afraid of being that vulnerable. She's a moviestar. ;) Chances that she'll ever get a clue is utterly minor.

But you seem to be aware of how important outlines are to get the information of it's content. So we share a form of detection for getting transparancy.

Anyway, she may enter my house, but obviously for one purpose.
 
"If proof is what is valid, then non-proof is what is not valid. Which leads to the statement, that everything that is not invalid is proof."

Note that I said "validation" - the *act* of validating, but also I'm saying they are *identical* - exactly the same thing.

but what you've said is very interesting, so I'll look into it:
(P is Proof, V is Valid, ~ means "not" and = means "equal to")

What your saying seems to be:
P=V
~P=~V
~~V=P

What you did seems similar (the same as?) "Affirming the consequent" (an invalid argument type):

*if x then y,
y
then x

*[Edit]: changed confusing example ;)

Things become clear when you investigate what "not, not valid" means: which you can investigate using sets (represent groups using circles): you make it look like everything that is not, not valid is the same set as proof, but you haven't entertained the idea that there may be other sets that don't join with "proof" that are still not, not valid; and there are.**

**[Edit]: me not saying what I meant :) whoops!

Its an easy mistake to make, or a very clever attempt at being sneaky. :wink:
 
WHAT? THE SUN HAS STOPPED???
 
Hurray, the Sun is on the move again!!
Time for a celebration!
Merry Christmas everyone!!
 
CaduceusMercurius a dit:
Hurray, the Sun is on the move again!!
Time for a celebration!
Merry Christmas everyone!!

Happy STOLEN PAGAN HOLIDAY everyone!

Hc

PS Jesus was never born, he never existed but he was a mushroom. And that is sound science!

;)
 
Jesus is Sirius

Or Jesus came from a Solar system where Sirius is the sun.
Jesus was an alien you might say then?

Jesus announced a new erra
Jesus is a mythical metaphore

Nevertheless, happy holidays everyone :)
 
Merry Christmas.

Here's a little anecdote. Last night I joined some people in going to church. It was a Catholic Christmas Eve Mass. It was actually pretty good and the message of the priest was about the same as most people on this forum would agree upon: We need to consider the Jesus story as a metaphor for our own lives, a way to talk about spiritual development. He also talked about the economic crisis and that it was a great opportunity for us to take action collectively and shape the economy in a new and honest way. He said that Jesus' message was against all systems, including the state, the economy and, not in the least, the church. Although I didn't agree with the obsession for Jesus, it was an interesting night and I had a positive feeling about it in general.
 
Merry Chrismas all.

Couldn't agree more fork, glad to hear there are still catholic priests with some sort of perspective: focusing on the message as apposed to the dogma.
 
Yeah I hope you're all having a good time !

What I meant is of course that the science to back up those simple needs is already here, we know how even to make photovoltaic cells with nanotechnology that make solar panels 5 tiems more effiscient, completely cheap to manufacture, 10 times as thin, 4 times less expensive... but the army brought the patent and everyone else is laughed at.

SO science is not our problem here, don't we agree ?

You get me right Brumangsia, she would not enter my realm, but not because I told her not to come, she would not be able to find it unless she transforms her body !

As a gift I have found a incredible painting that looks like me !

433px-Angelo_Bronzino_048.jpg


My head is a little more proeminent however, it is even more bulged on top making it more round and my belly is even more unique in musculature, but its quite alike !

Here's a man that would find my realm, however he would have to go on an extensive review of karmic genetic history before he could be "resurected" considering he was a high member of the "elite" back then.

He really looks like me, some would argue I look more like Jesus, I really think I look different, in the face and eyes.

:lol: Love you all, thanks for not being lazy !
 
Retour
Haut