listen, Ahuaeynjxs. There is no hate in my words. Pariah wrote a .doc file, because some discussions were held on completely different levels and therefore impossible to understand and agree on by the different members. Read it. It clearly states, that every statement must be underlined my a certain proof or logic. I guess it is a rather scientific approach, but what can be done? We want to understand each other and see what the other wants to say. OK.
So what?
It is difficult/impossible to most members of this forum to understand and believe your statement as you do not provide the mentioned proof/evidence or any sign thereof. You mentioned the ratio *Phi* and connected it to the DNA. Meduzz (I think) stated the numbers/length and breadth of the DNA and there was no ration *Phi* involved. What does that mean? Meduzz underlined his statement by bringing proof that is now accepted by scientists and therefore can be seen as a proof for the statement that your hypothesis is wrong. You didn't give any proof from your side. How do you now think that anyone will believe your statement?
Lucid dreams are no source of evidence. Revelations do not need to be ultimate, they can lead to delusion. Dreams can help but they also can delude. Say, e.g. in the case of Crick (if I remember), LSD was (probably) involved in the discovery of DNA, nonetheless there was further scientific proof for this discovery.
To cut a long story short: please provide evidence,numbers,proof instead of a train of claims without proof.
So what?
It is difficult/impossible to most members of this forum to understand and believe your statement as you do not provide the mentioned proof/evidence or any sign thereof. You mentioned the ratio *Phi* and connected it to the DNA. Meduzz (I think) stated the numbers/length and breadth of the DNA and there was no ration *Phi* involved. What does that mean? Meduzz underlined his statement by bringing proof that is now accepted by scientists and therefore can be seen as a proof for the statement that your hypothesis is wrong. You didn't give any proof from your side. How do you now think that anyone will believe your statement?
Lucid dreams are no source of evidence. Revelations do not need to be ultimate, they can lead to delusion. Dreams can help but they also can delude. Say, e.g. in the case of Crick (if I remember), LSD was (probably) involved in the discovery of DNA, nonetheless there was further scientific proof for this discovery.
To cut a long story short: please provide evidence,numbers,proof instead of a train of claims without proof.