maxfreakout
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 22/2/07
- Messages
- 1 474
my body is my church
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GOD a dit:OH !!! MAX.....two good , positive , sensible post after eachother....... i new you werent realy a dick head and were only pretending in most of your other posts . Why not keep it up and continue giveing rational helpfull explenations ....... and stop the pain in the arse nothing is real shit and spreading doubts and confusion .
restin a dit:Thanks for that. That's kinda my point. The Church and the Religions are two worlds.i think the word 'religion' is entirely meaningless unless it is understood in its true, LITERAL etymological sense (from the latin)
religion = re - ligio = RE-CONNECTING
the essence of true religion is the experience of reconnecting (ie re-establishing a broken link) to the divine source of existence, the wellspring from which the manifest universe emanates
spice a dit:Maybe in your intellectual ivory tower, but in practical reality they are one and the same.
No, then we have three things: the Church, the Religions and the Religion (or rather the religious experience). One is the institution, the other includes the Ideology, Tradition and Interconnection while the last is the Experience, the Idea."The Church and the Religions are two worlds."
I dont want tro split hairs but thats exactly not the point. They are exactly the same . The church and religeons as they are have nothing to do with religeon . What you mean is the churches and the idea of religeon are two different things . The real meaning of religeon is virtualy the oposite of what is today acepted as religeon . Its looking for truth and not pretending we have it . Thats partly what i mean when i say i dont see any psychonauts here all i see is people running away and lying to themselves by getting blasted out of their brains . Psychonautism and religeon if followed through come to the same point .
That's bullshit. I really don't get why you don't even try to understand what I say. Yes, the Church and the Dogma suppress the "true" idea of religion....which still doesn't set them as equals.Maybe in your intellectual ivory tower, but in practical reality they are one and the same.
exactly.religion is about religious experience (which involves the body), churches actively discourage and demonise religous experience. They give you inactive placebo bread and wine in church, not entheogens
maxfreakout a dit:spice a dit:Maybe in your intellectual ivory tower, but in practical reality they are one and the same.
i very much disagree with this, modern-era churches have lost all connection with the true meaning of religion, so it is completely false to connect them, churches have NOTHING TO DO with religion whatsoever
religion is about religious experience (which involves the body), churches actively discourage and demonise religous experience. They give you inactive placebo bread and wine in church, not entheogens
Agreed.Brugmansia a dit:I agree with you GOD, when you're stating that way too many individuals are attempting to adapt into McKenna's subjective realms.
But that doesn't necessarily mean you have to slag Terence for his angle of view, your subjective truth is in no way more accurate. Neither mine is. Or those of other forum members.
If you have any problems with groups of people who're standing with a pioneer who represents with what they're experiencing themselve, you'll struggle with a fundamental demeanour of the human character.
If you're looking for hymn yourself, which I belief is a fair wish for a human being, pull yourself together as yourself instead of trying to make a decomposition out of someone else who's sitting on a certain seat.
spice a dit:max, *I* already know all of this, and then some. You guys aren't approaching this correctly, *I* am not in need of convincing.....
the rest of the world is......
.....and the point isn't what I believe anyway, it's what the masses believe.
I can reconcile with this. I am very much aware of what you say - what I ment was rather theoretical, personal. But I see we are clear on that. It actually is hard to explain to people who don't understand it. From my experience, it is either you meet someone who understands this topic precisely or does not at all.spice a dit:restin- it's NOT bullshit either.....and, sorry....but you are in an intellectual ivory tower pertaining to this issue.
It's practical reality, which determines the 'tone' of our daily life to a greater degree than splitting hairs over the definition of a word.....and I DO understand what you are saying but I consider your definition of 'religion' to be an ARCHAIC one. Not that that devalues it, but when you say 'religion' I will bet (and win) that more people mentally categorize it in the way I am describing than in the way you are, even though I personally am on the same bandwagon as you.
This is what Terence meant in 'The Archaic Revival', about going back to the older ideas....I get it, but the point is that if you want people to understand it better, then half of that burden falls on you to explain it better.
Thinking of oneself , ego and judgeing people to be not worth it is the start of fashism . Its a trap on the way to the light , a test .
Sadly that to many people fall into this trap Rolling Eyes