Caduceus Mercurius
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 14/7/07
- Messages
- 9 628
Loneliness can be a problem for psychonauts. This was brought up in one of the latest podcasts by Max Freakout, and I think many of us can identify with this problem. I will post a few texts here, all having to do with loneliness, love and community. Feel free to add your own!
The first passage is from "The Different Drum, Community Making and Peace" by M.Scott Peck.
Chapter 2 Individuals and the Fallacy of Rugged Individualism I am lonely. To a degree my loneliness - and yours - is inevitable. Like you, I am an individual. And that means I am unique. There is no one else like me in this whole wide world. This "I-entity" that is me is different from each and every other "I-entity" that ever lived. Our separate identities, like fingerprints, make all of us unique individuals, identifiable one from another. This is the way it must be. The very genetic code is such that (except for the rare aberration of identical twins) each of us is not only subtly different biologically from any other human being who ever existed but is substantially dissimilar. From the moment of conception. And if that were not enough, all of us are born into different environments and develop differently according to a unique pattern throughout our own individual lives. Indeed, many believe this is not only the way it must be but is also the way it should be. Most Christians believe God designed it that way; He designed each soul differently. Christian theologians have reached a well-nigh universal conclusion: God loves variety. In variety He delights. And nowhere is that variety more apparent and inevitable than among the human species. Psychologists may or may not agree with notions of divine creation, but almost all agree with the theologians that the uniqueness of our individuality is called for. They envision it as the goal of human development that we should become fully ourselves. Theologians sometimes speak of this as the cal to "freedom" - the freedom to be our true individual selves as God created us to be. The psychiatrist Carl Jung named this goal of human development "individuation." The process of human development is one of becoming fully individual. Most of us never totally complete the process and may never get very far at all. Most, to a greater or lesser degree, fail to individuate - to separate - ourselves from family, tribe, or caste. Even into old age we remain figuratively tied to the apron strings of our family and culture. We are still dictated to by the values and expectations of our mothers and fathers. We still follow the direction of the prevailing wind and bow before the shibboleths of our society. We go with the crowd. From laziness and fear - fear of loneliness, fear of responsibility, and other nameless dreads - we never truly learn to think for ourselves and dare to be out of step with the stereotypes. But in light of all we understand, this failure to individuate is a failure to grow up and become fully human. For we are called to be individuals. We are called to be unique and different. We are also called to power. In this individuation process we must learn how to take responsibility for ourselves. We need to develop a sense of autonomy and self-determination. We must attempt, as best we can, to be captains of our own ships if not exactly masters of our destiny. Furthermore, we are called to wholeness. We should use what gifts or talents we are given to develop ourselves as fully as possible. As women, we need to strengthen our masculine sides; as men, our feminine sides. If we are to grow, we must work on the weak spots that prevent growth. We are beckoned towarde that self-sufficiency, that wholeness required for independence of thought and action. But this is only one side of the story. It is true that we are called to wholeness. But the reality is that we can never become completely whole in and of ourselves. We cannot be all things to ourselves and to others. We cannot be perfect. We cannot be doctors, lawyers, stockbrokers, farmers, politicians, stonemasons, and theologians, all rolled into one. It is true that we are called to power. Yet the reality is that there is a point beyond which our sense of self-determination not only becomes inaccurate and prideful but increasingly self-defeating. It is true that we are created to be individually unique. Yet the reality is that we are inevitably social creatures who desperately need each other not merely for sustenance, not merely for company, but for any meaning to our livs whatsoever. These, then, are the paradoxical seeds from which community can grow.
The first passage is from "The Different Drum, Community Making and Peace" by M.Scott Peck.
Chapter 2 Individuals and the Fallacy of Rugged Individualism I am lonely. To a degree my loneliness - and yours - is inevitable. Like you, I am an individual. And that means I am unique. There is no one else like me in this whole wide world. This "I-entity" that is me is different from each and every other "I-entity" that ever lived. Our separate identities, like fingerprints, make all of us unique individuals, identifiable one from another. This is the way it must be. The very genetic code is such that (except for the rare aberration of identical twins) each of us is not only subtly different biologically from any other human being who ever existed but is substantially dissimilar. From the moment of conception. And if that were not enough, all of us are born into different environments and develop differently according to a unique pattern throughout our own individual lives. Indeed, many believe this is not only the way it must be but is also the way it should be. Most Christians believe God designed it that way; He designed each soul differently. Christian theologians have reached a well-nigh universal conclusion: God loves variety. In variety He delights. And nowhere is that variety more apparent and inevitable than among the human species. Psychologists may or may not agree with notions of divine creation, but almost all agree with the theologians that the uniqueness of our individuality is called for. They envision it as the goal of human development that we should become fully ourselves. Theologians sometimes speak of this as the cal to "freedom" - the freedom to be our true individual selves as God created us to be. The psychiatrist Carl Jung named this goal of human development "individuation." The process of human development is one of becoming fully individual. Most of us never totally complete the process and may never get very far at all. Most, to a greater or lesser degree, fail to individuate - to separate - ourselves from family, tribe, or caste. Even into old age we remain figuratively tied to the apron strings of our family and culture. We are still dictated to by the values and expectations of our mothers and fathers. We still follow the direction of the prevailing wind and bow before the shibboleths of our society. We go with the crowd. From laziness and fear - fear of loneliness, fear of responsibility, and other nameless dreads - we never truly learn to think for ourselves and dare to be out of step with the stereotypes. But in light of all we understand, this failure to individuate is a failure to grow up and become fully human. For we are called to be individuals. We are called to be unique and different. We are also called to power. In this individuation process we must learn how to take responsibility for ourselves. We need to develop a sense of autonomy and self-determination. We must attempt, as best we can, to be captains of our own ships if not exactly masters of our destiny. Furthermore, we are called to wholeness. We should use what gifts or talents we are given to develop ourselves as fully as possible. As women, we need to strengthen our masculine sides; as men, our feminine sides. If we are to grow, we must work on the weak spots that prevent growth. We are beckoned towarde that self-sufficiency, that wholeness required for independence of thought and action. But this is only one side of the story. It is true that we are called to wholeness. But the reality is that we can never become completely whole in and of ourselves. We cannot be all things to ourselves and to others. We cannot be perfect. We cannot be doctors, lawyers, stockbrokers, farmers, politicians, stonemasons, and theologians, all rolled into one. It is true that we are called to power. Yet the reality is that there is a point beyond which our sense of self-determination not only becomes inaccurate and prideful but increasingly self-defeating. It is true that we are created to be individually unique. Yet the reality is that we are inevitably social creatures who desperately need each other not merely for sustenance, not merely for company, but for any meaning to our livs whatsoever. These, then, are the paradoxical seeds from which community can grow.