buffachino a dit:
Dante…
I understand what you mean, but neurotransmission or the process by which one processes experience does not only abide by relative human characteristics within nature.
yes, but plants use hormones to do that i am aware of what you are saying
and it's understood that we can't compare to the human parameter
buffachino a dit:
Instead of requiring an alkaloid like serotonin to transmit cognisance between cells, perhaps the mushrooms contain these alkaloids as a means of static awareness.
it's possible but they don't need that...it would be kinda stupid of them since their awareness is but static.
buffachino a dit:
That is to say that a mycelium need not convey a thought to be culminated with other thoughts from cell to cell in order to compute its experience of the world, as humans do.
of course
buffachino a dit:
Psilocybin allows a mycelium to perceive all of itself in one moment, without the need to transmit its perception at all.
this is where i disagree with you Buff. though your theory of static awareness might be plausible the fact that a mushroom uses alkaloids to percieve is absolutely out of question since it is merely stored and unused by the mushroom. i'll get to what i mean exactly in a few more lines
buffachino a dit:
In other mushroom species that do not contain these alkaloids, yet consume relatively the same biomass, the cognitive process is different and other chemical agents are used, that may not be active for humans.
this is again where you are wrong my dear watson because the fact that they are not active in the thoughtprocess doesn't mean they are not active in our system weather we are aware of it or not.
buffachino a dit:
Psilocybin/psilocin is just as much a key to the soul for mushrooms as nn-DMT is for humans.
and here you are wrong again my dear Watson, because you are contradicting yourself....you are comparing a psychoactive substance by human parameters...
buffachino a dit:
Then again, one cannot say that these psychoactive alkaloids are a by-product of mycelial metabolism, because many mushroom species produce these alkaloids, despite growing on different mediums.
it's still a byproduct because it's not used by the mushroom's body...i'm not making it less noble in it's purpose , because it still has a purpose tho it's not the one you think, by calling it thus. and your statement on alkaloid production of mushroom is understood.
buffachino a dit:
Mushrooms requiring different enzymes to metabolise biomass and assimilate energy, still produce the same by-product of that dissimilar metabolism. The mushrooms seek out and produce this alkaloid for a purpose. Thus, one thing that all of these mushrooms that produce these alkaloids do have in common is their need to perceive their existence, using these alkaloids as a vehicle for doing so rather than producing them by accident.
Peace.
No, no, no metabolism is one thing and since we are talking about the same spieces it is the same in everey single organism of that spieces thus they have same enzymes and metabolic pathways...tho on the fact that they have a purpose for producing it i agree a 100% with you but you hav to understand that the fact that they are producing an alkaloidial neurotransmitter is not for themselves, it's for us! they don't need an alkaloid to percieve themselves, they already do with their being alive and with their hormonally driven life like all plantlike lifeform on earth...the neurotransmitter is for them to communicate with us! to send us their message and reach out to our minds and let us know how THEY feel and what and HOW THEY are thinking. but they do not need that for themselves that is just a transcription of their message in huma form
i didn't mean to be offensive...tho i was and i apologize for that but my feelings got the upperhand and i wrote it out of my guts
i hope you understand my point of view
Peace
Dante
PS buff any news of the seeds i sent?