i agree with brug on astrology. but to braineater,
"is everybody's fate really "written" in the stars??? or do the stars write the fate of everybody on the earth???"
it's interralated, they are one and the same, as we are both made of matter. it's just like looking through either side of a telescope, one side is big, the other's small. it's relative... which side do you look through? (rhetoric)
nature, space, everything is fractal, there is no limit to how close you'd like to view something, just a limit on the size of our nanometers and tools, at the moment. but on the idea of everything being fractal, there is a similarity, not quite a "pattern" in the sense that it never repeats, cause it's not quite repeating that we can tell, but a "pattern" recognised within the "chaos" (or the chaos within the pattern). that is your "timewave zero", astrology is an examination, and a conclusion of such. a prediction of the constant. you wake up lying down every day, but never in exactly the same position. order and chaos are one and the same, just like black and white, they are both intangibles in the purest sense of their description.
but about schizophrenia, and psychosis... there's no such thing as "a psychosis", (it's a proper noun, therefore more descriptive, to note a more specific area of mental illness) although there are many different forms of "Psychosis". im not claiming to know what it is, because NOBODY does, but i know that the word psychotic is a word that was made by people who, in essence, don't understand or can't relate, EMPATHIZE with another group of people, and "diagnose" as such, solely based on differences between in behavior, for whatever THAT is worth. like heartcore says, everyone is basically nuts, or at least very weird.
read how convoluted the definition for savant is:
(just the introduction paragraphs)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome
by that description, any anti-social, intelligent computer nerd would fit the mold, because its a HUGE mold. the same sort of convolution in definition goes for words like autism, or retardation. painfully obscure. we have almost no concept of what is going on with these people...
describing a vague occurance (psychosis) with another set of vague occurances doesn't paint a valid, or valuable picture imo
and another note, i dont think anyone should describe schizophrenia as a separation from reality, i believe it's quite the exact opposite. the human mind can only "listen" to one thing at once, right? so what if he was simply listening(for this example) to something you didn't quite notice?
imagine that you're in a place(work for example) where the AC is running ALL the time, it's never NOT been on. you can direct your attention to it if you want, but you probably wont, odds are you will tune it out most of the time because it's repetitive and monotonous, maybe you think it's slightly obnoxious, and most of all, it doesn't "exist" in your direct environment. it's not interactive in the sense that you could practically turn it off, or learn anything from it. so you forget about it. it's not "there" anyways. not like your boss anyways. well, lets say the AC suddenly turns off or breaks or pauses. you notice this time, don't you? the "absence" of sound creates a "presence". that is how i view the schizophrenic. the guy who takes care of the AC (as often as his "disease" confirms"
they are still located in the universe, correct? so why would you say they are distanced or dissociated? your boss is an asshole anyways, is it his fault he'd rather entertain himself with the air vents? :shock:
why is it an illness? why is it anything? i question you, to ask yourself, and to quit thinking to other peoples set standards