Caduceus Mercurius
Holofractale de l'hypervérité
- Inscrit
- 14/7/07
- Messages
- 9 628
No, I was already familiar with the logical fallacies long before I heard about Jan Irvin's interest in the Trivium, and have always had mixed feelings about them. On the one hand they're extremely useful (as you point out particularly in the context of talking and writing, or more specifically in the context of debate). But I don't feel logic is sufficient to unlock the secrets of existence. For that one requires a more existential approach, involving things like meditation, psychedelic initiation and life itself (the school of hard knocks).Finarfin a dit:I think zezt and CM are criticizing the people using the method and not the method itself. That,s why i propose to separate these two things (method and people using the method). I think Zezt and CM are bias against the method because they do not like Jan Irvin and the people using the method.
HeartCore stated that he doesn't take psychedelics anymore because now he has the Trivium, which I think is also Jan Irvin's position. I don't see why it should be one or the other. Psychedelics grant access to a state of mind that is not available through the Trivium, and vice versa. I'm for a multi-dimensional approach to gaining insights: reading, studying (language, mathematics, philosophy, logic, psychology and so on), meditating, dancing, tripping, relating, being creative... Anything that helps you look at things in a new light.