I mean, can you say that the Jews during the Holocaust didn't hoped strong enough that they would escape from the concentration camps they were held captive in ? And so it just serves them well if so many died ?
According to these types of teachings, you can assume they hoped in the wrong way. It works like this, if you wish to escape from a concentration camp, that wish will come true literally: you wish to escape from a concentration camp.
These teachings claim that if you pose your wish right, like I am free, that will come true without exception.
For a long time I though this was bullshit and just outrageous lies but now I realize it all depends how you look at it. You can still be free while being imprisoned in a camp. This one is very hard to understand I guess because it feels like loosing. Please lord, grant me the power to accept the things I cannot change. Something like that
And Jahvisions, scientists dont have a clue either, they just have cool agreements in wording shit and they produce awe inspiring toys for aged spoiled kids. Scientists know nothing about life, nothing at all, nada, niets, nichts, de rien. The big bang theory is flakey enough as it is and relies on one small miracle preceeding the moment before the big bang. Well give me one tiny miracle to play with and I will explain to you how tomatos are actually intelligent creatures that departed here from space and while I'm at it, i will show you tree diferent meanings of life, completely opposite to eachother but paradoxically, making all sense
Terence Mckenna told this cool story about how science came into the western mind. The story is, and it seems true enough, that Decartes at some point was visited in his dreams by an angel who ordered him to conquer nature by measurement (exact wording differs). Ironic dont you think? Modern science was inspired by an angel. The really cool thing about this story, is that Decartes got his dream in the small town where many years later, Albert Einstein was born.
Worse than scientists are sceptist, especially the ones that combine their efforts in a shared endevour where they try to break down other peoples ideas. I;m not against this type of research and I thinjk in a lot of cases they do good work but the other side of the coin is that they suffer tunnelvision because if they want to disproof something, they already believe its untrue before they start to research. Rupert Sheldrake has an interesting article about these people on his site.