Quoi de neuf ?

Bienvenue sur Psychonaut.fr !

Le forum des amateurs de drogues et des explorateurs de l'esprit

New medical marijuana policy issued by Obama administration

darkwolfunseen

Sale drogué·e
Inscrit
5/8/09
Messages
944
I don't know if it's Nobel Prize worthy, but it's certainly a step in the right direction....





WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws, under new policy guidelines to be sent to federal prosecutors Monday.

Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state laws.

The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.

Fourteen states allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

California is unique among those for the presence of dispensaries -- businesses that sell marijuana and even advertise their services.

Attorney General Eric Holder said in March that he wanted federal law enforcement officials to pursue those who violate both federal and state law, but it has not been clear how that goal would be put into practice.

A 3-page memo spelling out the policy is expected to be sent Monday to federal prosecutors in the 14 states, and also to top officials at the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The memo, the officials said, emphasizes that prosecutors have wide discretion in choosing which cases to pursue, and says it is not a good use of federal manpower to prosecute those who are without a doubt in compliance with state law.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the legal guidance before it is issued.

At the same time, the officials said, the government will still prosecute those who use medical marijuana as a cover for other illegal activity. The memo particularly warns that some suspects may hide old-fashioned drug dealing or other crimes behind a medical marijuana business.

In particular, the memo urges prosecutors to pursue marijuana cases which involve violence, the illegal use of firearms, selling pot to minors, money laundering or other crimes.

And while the policy memo describes a change in priorities away from prosecuting medical marijuana cases, it does not rule out the possibility that the federal government could still prosecute someone whose activities are allowed under state law.

The memo, officials said, is designed to give a sense of prosecutorial priorities to U.S. Attorneys in the states that allow medical marijuana. It notes that pot sales in the United States are the largest source of money for violent Mexican drug cartels, but adds that federal law enforcement agencies have limited resources.

Medical marijuana advocates have been anxious to see exactly how the administration would implement candidate Barack Obama's repeated promises to change the policy in situations in which state laws allow the use of medical marijuana.

Shortly after Obama took office, DEA agents raided four dispensaries in Los Angeles, prompting confusion about the government's plans.
 
There is an inaccuracy in that article:


" California is unique among those for the presence of dispensaries -- businesses that sell marijuana and even advertise their services."

Not true. Colorado has dispensaries, too.....and they even surpassed Cali in one respect; the dispensaries are legally authorized to pursue a profit. That's significantly different than in California, where, it is my understanding, that the law does not authorize dispensaries except on a non-profit basis.

Also, according to Colorado law, the dispensary does not have to grow everything it sells, and can source product from the black market. This is a loophole in the law, and as written, the law basically says that the moment a dispensary takes posession, it IS LEGAL. Doesn't matter where it came from, and the law isn't interested in its provenance (where its from).

Yeah, I'm going next year.


:)
 
spice a dit:
Not true. Colorado has dispensaries, too.....and they even surpassed Cali in one respect;
Coloradooooooo Rockyyyy Mountaiiiin HIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGHHHHH :weedman:
 
While the USA is still a long way from legalising marijuana, it's good that they've taken a step in the right direction at the federal level, and the gulf between the USA's policy and that of Gordon the moron's in the UK has just got a step wider.
 
spice a dit:
Also, according to Colorado law, the dispensary does not have to grow everything it sells, and can source product from the black market. This is a loophole in the law, and as written, the law basically says that the moment a dispensary takes posession, it IS LEGAL. Doesn't matter where it came from, and the law isn't interested in its provenance (where its from).
:)

This is actually a bad thing. I can say that because this is exactly like the Dutch situation. You can predict that this will go out of hand, it's just a matter of time. Since growing still is an illegal activity, it will attract many people with questionable motives. In the Netherlands over the years, it has become one of the number one criminal enterprises and because of that, the government found an argument to hit harder on growing, driving more small time growers out of growing because of fear of eviction which effectively just fueled the business yet more into the hands of professional criminal organisations.

In the end, you'll get expensive grass, mass produced where 30% of the shit you buy in the legal shops, is dangerous to smoke because of illegal pesticides that are used by these growers who have only the interest of making much money and nothing else.

The only sane thing that works, is complete normalisation/decriminalisation so you have regulations on quality etc...
 
All I have to say is I've already heard similar statements from this Administration this year, will have to see what happens.
 
Retour
Haut