Ok, ok, good point.
A bigot is clearly a bigot, based on facts.
BUT, who decides if anybody is a nut and why is someone a nut?
Just because they don't understand things, or act "out of the norm"?
This, to me, seems pretty judgemental and distantiating, creating more distance between people.
Hokus pokus is another thing, why is anything hokus pokus?
Just because someone believes in something someone else doesn't believe in (even if it's proven that it's not true) that doesn't make it wrong.
Can be a misjudgement or a misinterpretation or just the need for a belief in something although it's not necissarily true, but that doesn't make it wrong does it?
I've had some pretty far out beliefs of my own, but I could laugh about it afterwards, but before that I had to realise what I actually was believing in.
Suggesting that people that believe in stuff (you think or know for a fact is bs) should laugh about themselves is like saying:"You're wrong" or "You're a nut"
Wich is basicly judgement.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not accusing you, I'm just trying to bring some perspective/get some understanding here.
I'm learning all the way