When I say chronic, I mean it in the best sense of personal, ultra frequent use; that’s daily smoking on average 1-3 grams, mixed, in a bong and only getting 8 cones from that because of the amount packed into them and the size of the cone; for an example of my use.
This only leads to a degradation of the effects over long term, thus not being the ‘truly’ powerful high that cannabis should entail every time. I personally would never achieve a truly satisfactory high if smoking this frequently and in such amounts; as I have experienced in the past with use I would deem chronic.
I don’t think ‘marijuana’ is a term that should be used at all, no matter what context. It only represents the ignorance about the substance and its use by those who are non-using, misinformed prohibitionists and as you have said, abusers who don’t know anything about the substance other than the deemed, perceived effect on their petty mental faculty. There’s no respect, and this often leads to the term chronic being used, yet in my personal case I just used much too frequently and in excess; mostly because of the nicotine addiction.
Joints utilise a lot more bud in their consumption and yet give a less satisfactory or efficient high and so would be worse for your body (in smoking terms, especially in upper lung damage with frequency) and give you less effect; this would give the illusion of it being a stronger high with prolonged use and routine, whilst only leading in my view to faster addiction if mixed and an illusory effect of a constant pinnacle of effectiveness. I’m not saying joints are in any way bad (besides there much larger tar count in consumption), but smoking them and only them in a frequent daily fashion only leads to the suppression of the better effects faster and gives more damage if only used in this way over time. Bongs too give this with constant and long term usage and so the term chronic is the best way of describing this degree.
And chronic alcoholics? That’s really anyone who drinks in excess of one drink per day or in any regularity; alcohol is poison (would you drink turpentine or methanol?) and shouldn’t be classed in the same way or even uttered in the same sentence as cannabis.
And with psilocybin, I don’t think I would use something as divinatory and sacred as a mere supplement to my vision. That’s desecration to the true reality of the experience. It’s like using anything as a benign and novel substitute for real relief of any of our petty discomforts. Disrespect to its purpose other than personal gain.
Its like trying to sterilise nature and put it into some kind of plastic wrap and place it in a supermarket for commercial sale; urgh…